Water is one of our world’s most precious resources, and unfortunately one of our most pressing environmental concerns of the time. Humans will always need water so it’s important to know how to utilize it and do so correctly in order to conserve it. By comparing water systems from different times and places, we can gain insight by comparing old systems to see what worked for past communities to help develop future plans. We can also learn what aspects of past water systems failed and why, to know what to avoid. If I could rewind time, I would try giving advice about water resources particularly to Turkey and maybe Syria as well. First, before anything else I would tell them how necessary decent water laws and legislation are to a successful water system. Water laws provide economic stability and security to those who use water, and they also induce efficient water use. Another useful concept I found was the three irrigator principles from Valencia: the concept of proportional distribution, the concept of individual responsibility to the community, and the concept of collective responsibility by self government. Establishing a tradition of cooperation and group work to produce a solid irrigation system would be helpful advice, especially with all of this violence sparked by global warming, climate change and lack of water causing failed farming. I see this practice even today in my father’s neighborhood, where all of the neighbors take turns tending to the irrigation canal that they all water their fields with.
As for different types of water systems to try, “Did ISIL Arise Partly Because of Climate Change?” informed that the sea level in Syria will rise and flood the low-lying Egyptian delta. This seems like a logical place to use a tide mill, which was discussed in “Where Has the Water Come From?”. A tide mill makes a connection to salt water from the sea. It works by impounding water at high tide behind a barrier, so when the tide rises, water enters a tidal millpond through a sluice gate. There are several constraints to this method, but the Syrian people would be able to make use of their natural high tide.
Something I would advise the countries to change would be Turkey not use dams anymore, as they are posing heavy environmental concerns in the region. Perhaps they should try to rely on rain fall as little as possible and instead try for groundwater through the use of a qanat, as an option.
I would hope that the leaders of these regions would listen to this advice and find it worthy of implementing, but I could see how they would easily be stubborn and decide to do nothing. in the article “Did ISIL Arise Partly Because of Climate Change?” it says that Syrian officials are “more interested in lining their pockets than in using state resources to address the water crisis”. That attitude mixed with the general atmosphere of violence recently could prove for little cooperation from officials.
Three additional things I would like to know for a formal report are:
- How much water is being used on average per person in these regions
- The irrigation administration set ups in these regions and the current laws and enforcement
- More about the differing climate and water availability
I would look for answers to these questions in peer reviewed articles and other research of the same validity and reliability.
stevenhuber says
Very good post! Good job describing specific technology to be used and methods to conserve water, rather than just stating that “they need to practice better water management”.
Hunter Worthington says
Caitlyn,
Great post! I like how you gave very specific examples in how the leaders should change their policies and structure designs in order to keep a better storage of water. I definitely agree in that the leaders would be stubborn and stuck in their ways enough to not change, despite the evidence you might show them.